<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Google Book Settlement &#187; court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wo.ala.org/gbs/tag/court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs</link>
	<description>An informational site for the library community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Library associations submit supplemental filing, call for increased oversight of Google agreement</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/09/02/library-associations-submit-supplemental-filing-call-for-increased-oversight-of-google-agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/09/02/library-associations-submit-supplemental-filing-call-for-increased-oversight-of-google-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Books Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google book settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library associations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/09/02/library-associations-submit-supplemental-filing-call-for-increased-oversight-of-google-agreement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CONTACTS: Jenni Terry ALA Washington Office Press Officer Prudence S. Adler ARL Associate Executive Director FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WASHINGTON, D.C. – The American Library Association (ALA), the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) today submitted a supplemental filing with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: right;"><strong>CONTACTS:<br />
</strong><a href="mailto:jterry@alawash.org" target="_blank">Jenni Terry<br />
</a>ALA Washington Office Press Officer</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><a href="mailto://prue@arl.org" target="_blank">Prudence S. Adler</a><br />
ARL Associate Executive Director</p>
<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, D.C. – The American Library Association (ALA), the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) today submitted a <a href="http://wo.ala.org/gbs/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Supplemental-Library-Association-Comments-on-the-Proposed-Settlement.pdf">supplemental filing</a> with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York overseeing the proposed Google Book Search settlement to address developments that have occurred since the groups submitted their <a href="http://wo.ala.org/gbs/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/Library-Association-Comments-on-the-Proposed-Settlement.pdf">filing</a> on May 4.</p>
<p>While the library associations’ position has not changed since their initial filing, the groups believe that recent activity, such as an amended agreement reached between Google and the University of Michigan, the University of Texas-Austin and the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Google’s recent public statement regarding privacy, and the library associations’ communication with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) should be brought to the court’s attention.  In their supplemental filing, the library associations call upon the court to address concerns with pricing review, to direct Google to provide more detail on privacy issues, and to broaden representation on the Books Rights Registry.</p>
<p>Both of the filings emphasize that vigorous oversight by the court is needed to ensure the proposed settlement reached among Google, the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers does not erode core library values, such as equity of access to information, patron privacy and intellectual freedom.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<div id="attachment_612" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 78px"><a href="http://wo.ala.org/gbs/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Supplemental-Library-Association-Comments-on-the-Proposed-Settlement.pdf"><img class="size-full wp-image-612      " title="pdf_icon" src="http://wo.ala.org/gbs/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/pdf_icon.jpg" alt="Supplemental Library Association Comments on the Proposed Settlement" width="68" height="68" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Supplemental Library Association Comments on the Proposed Settlement</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/09/02/library-associations-submit-supplemental-filing-call-for-increased-oversight-of-google-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

