<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Google Book Settlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wo.ala.org/gbs/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs</link>
	<description>An informational site for the library community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Library Copyright Alliance releases fourth guide to Google Books proposed settlement following judge’s decision by New Demystifying the Latest News for the Google Book [non-] Settlement &#8211; Stephen&#039;s Lighthouse</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2011/04/01/library-copyright-alliance-releases-fourth-guide-to-google-books-proposed-settlement-following-judge%e2%80%99s-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>New Demystifying the Latest News for the Google Book [non-] Settlement &#8211; Stephen&#039;s Lighthouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=815#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>[...] Library Copyright Alliance releases fourth guide to Google Books proposed settlement following judge... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Library Copyright Alliance releases fourth guide to Google Books proposed settlement following judge&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on D is for Digitize Symposium, Links to Panelists Essays Available by Tweets that mention Google Book Settlement » D is for Digitize Symposium, Links to Panelists Essays Available -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2011/02/04/d-is-for-digitize-symposium-links-to-panelists-essays-available/comment-page-1/#comment-4043</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Google Book Settlement » D is for Digitize Symposium, Links to Panelists Essays Available -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=806#comment-4043</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ALA OITP, ARL Public Policy. ARL Public Policy said: RT @oitp: In the better late than never category- essays from 2009 symposium on Google Book Search http://bit.ly/euj64s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ALA OITP, ARL Public Policy. ARL Public Policy said: RT @oitp: In the better late than never category- essays from 2009 symposium on Google Book Search <a href="http://bit.ly/euj64s" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/euj64s</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Panel to discuss Google Book Search settlement and libraries during ALA Annual Conference by Tryin&#8217; to Get My Mojo Workin&#8217; &#124; In the Library with the Lead Pipe</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2010/06/22/panel-to-discuss-google-book-search-settlement-and-libraries-during-ala-annual-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Tryin&#8217; to Get My Mojo Workin&#8217; &#124; In the Library with the Lead Pipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=798#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>[...] class of Emerging Leaders. I attended programs that were of interest to me such as the Google Book Search Settlement Panel, and the Open Access Debate. I attended Library Advocacy Day and met with my state [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class of Emerging Leaders. I attended programs that were of interest to me such as the Google Book Search Settlement Panel, and the Open Access Debate. I attended Library Advocacy Day and met with my state [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Library associations submit supplemental filing, call for increased oversight of Google agreement by michaelzimmer.org &#187; Google Book Search Privacy Policy Mirrors Web Search, with One Hopeful, albeit Limited, Difference</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/09/02/library-associations-submit-supplemental-filing-call-for-increased-oversight-of-google-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelzimmer.org &#187; Google Book Search Privacy Policy Mirrors Web Search, with One Hopeful, albeit Limited, Difference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/09/02/library-associations-submit-supplemental-filing-call-for-increased-oversight-of-google-agreement/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>[...] Google needs to do is think like a librarian, and do whatever it takes to ensure readers&#8217; privacy and confidentiality is protected, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google needs to do is think like a librarian, and do whatever it takes to ensure readers&#8217; privacy and confidentiality is protected, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary of the Google Book Settlement Session at ALA Midwinter Conference by Google Announces New Privacy Policy for Book Search &#171; ACRL&#8217;s Intellectual Freedom Committee Blog</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/01/28/summary-of-the-google-book-settlement-session-at-ala-midwinter-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Announces New Privacy Policy for Book Search &#171; ACRL&#8217;s Intellectual Freedom Committee Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=93#comment-495</guid>
		<description>[...] presentations to library and higher education groups, Google has verbally stated that they plan to offer reader [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presentations to library and higher education groups, Google has verbally stated that they plan to offer reader [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ALA Annual Conference Event: The Google Book Search Settlement&#8211;Continuing to explore what’s in it for libraries by Monica Clemens</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/07/08/ala-annual-conference-event-the-google-book-search-settlement-continuing-to-explore-what%e2%80%99s-in-it-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica Clemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=383#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Monopoly in the Making.  If this settlement goes through, Google would have usurped all of our libraries with absolutely no competition from any other vendor.  &quot;In the absence of competition for the services it will enable, the settlement could compromise fundamental library values such as equity of access to information, patron privacy, and intellectual freedom.&quot;  (See letter from American Library Association, 7.29.09, within - which is pro settlement. why?).

If the settlement goes through, Google will control all digital rights to all written literary works.  ALL written works.  It&#039;s a bogus elite settlement that does not take into account writers (mostly children) who are unpublished - further, Google has no other competition.  ugh!  

[If one considers how much it costs to access Lexis or Westlaw. Or to download an article from WSJ or American Scientific. the potential revenue to Google is staggering.]  

Also this letter from the Library Association assumes the DOJ is a regulator and is going to monitor Google&#039;s ties.  There is no excuse for arranging this kind of settlement.  It&#039;s wrong.  

I whole heartedly disagree with this settlement.  

Thank you for listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monopoly in the Making.  If this settlement goes through, Google would have usurped all of our libraries with absolutely no competition from any other vendor.  &#8220;In the absence of competition for the services it will enable, the settlement could compromise fundamental library values such as equity of access to information, patron privacy, and intellectual freedom.&#8221;  (See letter from American Library Association, 7.29.09, within &#8211; which is pro settlement. why?).</p>
<p>If the settlement goes through, Google will control all digital rights to all written literary works.  ALL written works.  It&#8217;s a bogus elite settlement that does not take into account writers (mostly children) who are unpublished &#8211; further, Google has no other competition.  ugh!  </p>
<p>[If one considers how much it costs to access Lexis or Westlaw. Or to download an article from WSJ or American Scientific. the potential revenue to Google is staggering.]  </p>
<p>Also this letter from the Library Association assumes the DOJ is a regulator and is going to monitor Google&#8217;s ties.  There is no excuse for arranging this kind of settlement.  It&#8217;s wrong.  </p>
<p>I whole heartedly disagree with this settlement.  </p>
<p>Thank you for listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on News by District Dispatch &#187; Is Google Waging a Public Relations Campaign on Libraries?</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/articles-blog-posts-links/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>District Dispatch &#187; Is Google Waging a Public Relations Campaign on Libraries?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?page_id=10#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] out to library leaders, likely in response to an increase in interest in the community and the press about the concerns libraries have raised in response to the proposed private settlement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out to library leaders, likely in response to an increase in interest in the community and the press about the concerns libraries have raised in response to the proposed private settlement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grimmelmann and Vaidhyanathan Talk Google Book Settlement at Georgetown University by Google Book Settlement Link Dump Awesomeness at pureinformation.org</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/02/28/grimmelmann-and-vaidhyanathan-talk-google-book-settlement-at-georgetown-university/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Book Settlement Link Dump Awesomeness at pureinformation.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=190#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] ALA OITP: Grimmelmann and Vaidhyanathan Talk Google Book Settlement at Georgetown University [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ALA OITP: Grimmelmann and Vaidhyanathan Talk Google Book Settlement at Georgetown University [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary of the Google Book Settlement Session at ALA Midwinter Conference by Intellectual Freedom Committee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Book Settlement</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/2009/01/28/summary-of-the-google-book-settlement-session-at-ala-midwinter-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Freedom Committee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Book Settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?p=93#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] the recent discussion at ALA&#8217;s Midwinter meeting, Dan Clancy from Google said a lot things that should give us more confidence that many of these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the recent discussion at ALA&#8217;s Midwinter meeting, Dan Clancy from Google said a lot things that should give us more confidence that many of these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ALA Principles for Digital Content by My (Our) Abusive Relationship with Google and What We Can Do About It &#124; In the Library with the Lead Pipe</title>
		<link>http://wo.ala.org/gbs/past-issue-briefs/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>My (Our) Abusive Relationship with Google and What We Can Do About It &#124; In the Library with the Lead Pipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wo.ala.org/gbs/?page_id=12#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] principles and best practices that we have worked so hard to develop—of particular relevance, the Principles for Digital Content, and the Principles for a Networked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] principles and best practices that we have worked so hard to develop—of particular relevance, the Principles for Digital Content, and the Principles for a Networked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

